Getty Images First high-profile AI lawsuit kicks off – Geek Review


The company wants a future where the art of artificial intelligence respects intellectual property.

AI-generated image with watermark from Getty Images overlaid on canvas.
Triff/Shutterstock.com, stable spread

Last month, we made it clear that Just a matter of time Before using technical tools such as stable spread are the subject of copyright or intellectual property litigation. Getty Images now says it is Taking Amnesty International’s stability case to court. This is the first meaningful lawsuit against an AI image generation company.

The details of the lawsuit are mostly unknown. A lawsuit was filed in the High Court of Justice in London, where Getty Images alleged that Stability AI (the manufacturer of Stable Diffusion) illegally copied and manipulated millions of copyright-protected images and associated metadata owned or represented by Getty Images.

Essentially, Getty Images claims that its stock images have been included in the Stability AI training data without any form of licensing or compensation. You don’t need to be a lawyer or a rocket scientist to prove this right — the stable proliferation sometimes spits out watermarked images from Getty Images, Shutterstock, and other image platforms. I convinced Stable Diffusion to produce just such an image, which you can see at the top of this article.

AI image generators are usually trained on publicly available data. They scrap images, illustrations, and other images from the Internet without the permission of the original artists. This was a common criticism of Lens AI, the “magic photo” app that went viral last month. (For reference, Lensa AI is working on Stable Diffusion, Made more than $30 million in revenue. If you are an artist whose work is included in the Stable Diffusion training data, you have earned $0 from Lensa AI.)

It is difficult to bring a legal case against platforms such as Stable Diffusion, as the court has failed to set a precedent on the matter. Also, AI Stability is technically a “non-profit” that operates under the “fair use” or “fair dealings” argument. That’s why this lawsuit is so important — Getty Images is much stronger than the individual artist, and its case against Stability AI could set the legal expectations for generative AI going forward.

“Getty Images has provided licenses to leading technical innovators for purposes related to training AI systems… AI has not pursued any license from Getty Images and instead, we believe, has chosen to ignore viable licensing options and long-term legal protections in pursuit of their own independent business interests.” .

In an interview with the edgeGetty Images CEO Craig Peters explains the intent of the lawsuit. Getty Images is not interested in legal damages, nor does it want to slow the progress of artificial intelligence. Instead, you want to prevent “one entity from taking advantage of the backs of others”.

for what it’s worth, AI stability claims that its training data is “obtained and used ethically, ethically, and legally”. And the second generation of Stable Diffusion AI will allow artists to opt out of the training data set.

Source: Getty Images





Source link

Related Posts

Precaliga