Shakhtar Donetsk CEO explains why he sold Mykhaylo Mudryk to Chelsea instead of Arsenal

Shakhtar Donetsk chief executive Sergey Balkin insists it was an “outside visual impression” that Mykhailo Modric was close to joining Arsenal before signing for Chelsea.

Arsenal prioritized the winger’s move during the January transfer window, despite their reluctance to match Shakhtar’s price up front – a stumbling block the Blues have capitalized on.

After a quick round of negotiations at the weekend, Modric was presented as a Chelsea player on Sunday, despite his outspoken preference for joining Arsenal over the past month, and has regularly posted on social media about the Premier League leaders.

Talking to the athleteBalkin revealed that it was only on Saturday that he realized Modric would head to Stamford Bridge instead.

Now listen as Scott Saunders hosts Graeme BaileyAnd Toby Cudworth And Tom Gott In the latest episode of Talking Transfers. This week they discussed Chelsea’s frantic transfer strategy, which includes loan moves for Joao Felix and interest in Romeo Lafia and Marcus Thuram among others, Man United’s pursuit of Burnley striker Woweghorst, Brighton future Leandro Trossard and more. Available on All audio platforms.

If you don’t see this embed, click here To listen to the podcast!

I realized two days ago [Saturday] When Chelsea got here – co-owner Bagdad Eghbali W [director of global talent and transfers] Paul Winstanley. They came to Antalya in Turkey [where Shakhtar have been at a training camp],” He said.

“Before Chelsea arrived, I didn’t know they were close, because I communicated with Arsenal the same way I did with Chelsea. I can even tell you more: I’ve met Arsenal more times than Chelsea. So, before this last meeting, Arsenal was close. , or a little closer to this deal than Chelsea.

“If you don’t count the phone calls, it was three times [he met with Arsenal].

“from my point of view, [the social media posts] He is the reason everyone talks about Arsenal. That’s because Arsenal contacted the player almost a month and a half before they contacted us. Can you imagine, for example, having Mikel Arteta, Does Oleksandr Zinchenko and the sporting director call you to ask Arsenal to call you almost every day, every two days, every three days? You may or may not want this step but you follow this type of reception and contacts.

“If I talk about Chelsea, they called me at the end of December and asked if they could contact Modric because they were interested in him and wanted to talk to him. I said: ‘No problem, you can call him.’ The time they called was at the end of December or the beginning of January, and they called the player and the player’s agent. and met the financial conditions.

“So, why did so many people around him have the impression that Modric was going to Arsenal? That’s because Arsenal called him and then Modric started watching some Arsenal games. But negotiations are negotiations. When you haven’t shut everything down, when you haven’t [close] Last point, you can not finish the deal. So it was just an external visual impression that Modric was close to Arsenal.”

Balkin added that despite reports to the contrary, Arsenal’s total deal was the same as Chelsea’s, but the issue was how the fee was paid.

“Inclusive, [their transfer offers were] The same. Not nearly the same – it was the same number. Fixed part, variable part, rewards. But if you look at the hard part and the rewards, they are completely different.”

Source link

Related Posts