Twitter was sued yesterday by a consulting firm that says it was never paid for the work it did in the lawsuit that forced Elon Musk to complete his purchase of the company.
Charles River Associates (CRA) says Twitter hired her in August 2022, shortly after Twitter sued Musk Because of his refusal to complete the merger agreement amounting to 44 billion dollars. Musk last You have completed your purchase in late october after it was revealed that he was He is likely to lose in court.
From August 15 to October 27, the CRA “provided all required professional advice and services to Twitter and its legal counsel in connection with the Musk case and pursuant to the terms and conditions of the contract,” according to the statement. lawsuit Filed yesterday in Suffolk County Superior Court in Boston, Massachusetts. “Twitter breached the contract by not paying all of the CRA’s bills,” the lawsuit said, which added up to $2.19 million.
The CRA is seeking the full amount owed on invoices and double or triple damages for “fraudulent and willful breach of a counseling agreement, plus interest, costs and legal fees.” The CRA lawsuit is one of several alleging that Musk-owned Twitter refused to pay bills for services rendered before he bought the company.
Software vendor Imply Data previously claimed this Twitter failed to pay Billed for $1,092,000 and apparently intends to implicitly stress another $7 million in payments on a contract that expires in late 2024. Additional breach-of-contract lawsuits allege Twitter failed to pay $136,000 in rent In San Francisco’s office tower $197,725 for private jet services.
The lawsuit says Twitter did not respond to requests for payment
The new lawsuit said that “CRA and its senior advisor, Professor Mark Zmijewski, were retained by Twitter to provide economic advisory services related to Professor Zmijewski’s expected expert rebuttal report and expert rebuttal testimony, which would have rebutted the expert report and testimony of one of Musk’s party experts, Yvette Austin Smith.” .
The lawsuit said the CRA’s work included “research and analysis underlying the expert opinions to be included in the expert cassation report,” “preparation of drafts of the report,” and other expert advice and litigation support under the direction of Twitter’s legal counsel.
The lawsuit describes the CRA’s attempts to get paid for its work after Musk reluctantly completed the Twitter purchase rather than continue to fight the lawsuit. The CRA said it did not receive a response to a series of letters it sent about unpaid invoices during the month after Musk’s purchase.
The CRA said Twitter also did not follow the agreed-upon process for disputing invoices. “Twitter has agreed in accordance with the terms of the contract that any objection with respect to TRA invoices must be submitted by the customer in writing within five (5) business days after receipt of the challenged invoice,” the suit said. . Twitter has never filed an objection to the CRA regarding CRA billing.