Twitter’s exodus was the plan all along, perhaps? • TechCrunch


When Peter Close Last updated to his LinkedIn profile, he listed his role as “Unemployment Survivor” on Twitter. However, Close, a senior software engineer who joined the company in the spring of 2020, is also gone. He quit yesterday, explaining calmly last night On Twitter, he decided not to quit because of the Twitter block or because he hated his new owner, Elon Musk, but simply because he no longer had any incentive to stay.

It now appears that a large proportion of Close’s colleagues felt the same way. While they were not part of 50% Of the Twitter employees who lost their jobs at the end of October in an unprecedented social media layoff, like the 3,700 remaining employees were notified this week by Musk. The Cucumber It gave them: commit to a new Twitter that’s “extremely hardcore,” “work long hours at a high intensity,” or leave the company with three months’ severance pay.

a Hobson’s choiceClearly, Musk hoped that some of the remaining percentage of Twitter’s employees — who are expensive and have no say in hiring — would choose to leave the company. In fact, Musk has reportedly told investors that it could go down 75% of employees Before taking over the company, so whether he’s in shock, cutting company muscle, or celebrating the success of his vague plan, it’s something Musk and his inner circle know.

Sure, the numbers are staggering for almost everyone. New York times mentioned Earlier today based on internal estimates of its sources, at least 1,200 full-time employees turned in their pictorial key cards. Clowes, in a long line of Tweets About his departure, he indicates that the number may be even higher. Speaking of his “foundation,” he wrote that “85%+” of his colleagues were laid off in October and that a staggering “80%” of those who remained unsubscribed yesterday.

What strikes us, when reading Close’s explanation of why he left, is not that many people have gone out with him. Even more surprising is that 100% of the staff didn’t leave, which raises questions about who Musk thinks will stay. If only he wanted those employees who had no choice but to kill themselves right now, it seemed. . . Like a flawed business strategy.

Otherwise, if Musk was hoping to stick with everyone else, one assumes a carrot would have been offered. Instead, as Close wrote yesterday, there were only sticks and lots of them.

Close wrote, for example, that he left because he “didn’t know why I stayed anymore. Previously I stayed for people, vision, and of course money (let’s be honest). All of those have changed drastically or uncertain.”

Clowes left because had he stayed he “would have been constantly on call with little support for an indefinite amount of time on many additional complex systems with which I had no experience.”

He left because he saw no positive side in Musk’s reckless management style, which Close suggests he could have endured much longer if he hadn’t been working entirely in the dark.

Instead, by his account, Musk never shared a vision for the platform with employees. “There is no five-year plan like Tesla,” Close wrote. “Nothing more than anyone can see on Twitter. Allegedly coming for those who stayed, but the request was blind faith and required signing a class offer before seeing it. A test of pure loyalty.”

Close suggested that there had been so little communication from above that rumors and speculation had swirled. Among the employees’ obvious concerns: Not only will Twitter become subscription-based but adult content could become a core component of its offering. (Emphasizing how little insiders have been told, Clowes went on to point out a Wired story About Washington Post A story about Musk’s reported discussions with employees about monetizing adult content on Twitter.)

Finally, Close wrote, there was no “retention plan” for those who stayed and “no clear upside to keeping it in sight. Just ‘trust us’-style verbal promises.”

Indeed, by yesterday, Clawes was living in a rather dismal world of work, one in which “his friends are gone, the vision is hazy, there is a storm coming and there is no financial improvement,” he wrote. So “[w]hat will you? he continued. “Are you going to sacrifice your time with your kids during the holidays for vague assurances and a chance to make a rich person even richer, or are you going to do it?”

You were going out, which Musk certainly expected.

right? one might think?

We may never know for sure and it may not matter. The bigger question now is whether Musk can rebuild with what remains – before It’s all in the caves.





Source link

Related Posts

Precaliga